On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:11 AM, Joe 'Zonker' Brockmeier <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:58 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> > wrote: > > If dissenting voices has nothing to offer than "it is all wrong, I > > will go with product x", then it is not even worth to bother, because > > all it does it creates flame wars like this. There is constructive > > criticism (bug reports, written use cases which doesn't work), and > > then there is just empty posturing, just because you disagree with > > overall direction of platform. > > I didn't say "it is all wrong" or anything of the sort. I simply said > that it might be instructive to note that few GNOME users are coming > out to support GNOME 3 in the wake of Linus, Ted, and others > criticizing it. > > I'm 100% certain that wouldn't have been the case three years ago. I > talk to a lot of people, and I've found very few who genuinely like > GNOME 3.0 - and I'm talking about people who've loved or at least > liked GNOME 2.x. > > BTW, Linus and others, while ranting, have also pointed to specific > things they do not like about GNOME 3. > > Sorry, I didn't want to turn this into a referendum on GNOME 3 design. The answer could simply be that kernel developers have the support of other kernel developers who in turn are also just saying the same thing. sri
-- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
