Agreed with the above, and follow on to my liking Ubuntu.

Ubuntu GNOME works for me then.

Brett
On Aug 13, 2012 5:08 PM, "Brett Legree" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm quite sure you would be approved.
>
> Your point about it having the fallback is good - Ubuntu GR perhaps.
>
> I'm sort of in the camp that GNOMEbuntu or GNObuntu sound sort of wonky.
>
> (To be honest, I don't care for the names of any official spin, except for
> Ubuntu Studio... because it doesn't sound like Kubuntu, Xubuntu etc.)
>
> Brett
> On Aug 13, 2012 4:45 PM, "Jeremy Bicha" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 13 August 2012 16:31, Brett Legree <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > I have spent some time reviewing this
>> > http://www.ubuntu.com/aboutus/trademarkpolicy for other reasons, and
>> there
>> > is a section pertaining to naming remixes.
>> >
>> > I would suggest Ubuntu GSR (for "GNOME Shell Remix"), it sounds kind of
>> > high-tech, mysterious, perhaps a bit mechanical (a motorcycle of some
>> kind?)
>> > and it isn't hard to pronounce.
>>
>> I'm optimistic that we would get approval as an official Ubuntu
>> derivative relatively quickly. Once that happens, I believe we'd be
>> authorized to use *buntu in our project name. I will verify with the
>> Ubuntu trademark people also though.
>>
>> Also at this time, my test ISO includes GNOME Classic/Fallback so it's
>> not just about GNOME Shell.
>>
>> Jeremy
>> --
>> marketing-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
>>
>
-- 
marketing-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

Reply via email to