Hi Bruce, On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:10:18AM -0700, Bruce Byfield wrote: > Negative articles? Are you kidding? > > Because I mention what many people in the community are saying? What some > GNOME developers are saying?
I totally was wrong about you. My apologies. I honestly was only reading the article, nothing more. It seems like yet another rant, based on things I in my head explained loads of times (I spent loads of hours each week saying pretty much the same thing). > If I didn't care what was happening in the free software community, I > wouldn't > have written the article in the first place. I would be doing a poor job as a > journalist, and doing nothing for the community if I only reported on the > happy things and ignored the problems. > > That said, if anyone cares to engage in a responsible conversation about > GNOME's current state and how the project is being received, you're welcome > to > get in touch. I can't guarantee publication of the result -- that is > ultimately up to my editors -- but I would certainly be interested in writing > an article that accurately reflects opposing views. I don't have to agree > with a position to think that it's worth letting other people hear. About the latter: I actually do like if people disagree. I just thought some assumptions were really easy and IIRC there were some bits about 'GNOME developers will probably do XXX' that made me assume the worst. In any case: sorry. -- Regards, Olav -- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
