On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 02:56:05PM +0100, Dave Neary wrote: > On 12/05/2012 11:05 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: > >On Wed, Dec 05, 2012 at 09:01:57AM +0100, Dave Neary wrote: > >>LinuxInsider.com: "Return of the King: GNOME 2 Is Making Its Way > >>Back": > >>http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Return-of-the-King-GNOME-2-Is-Making-Its-Way-Back-76753.html > > > >WTF. An article consisting of opinions of people on slashdot and sites > >such as "Linux Rant" as well as random people on Google+? > > > >This aside from getting the basics wrong. It was not about getting > >"GNOME 2" back. > > I just copy & paste links from Google Alerts which are not about > garden gnomes (actually, garden gnome articles outnumber GNOME > articles by about 2 to 1).
It is nice to keep track! > Perhaps we should blame the journalist for not doing his research - > he'll know better next time. s/his/her/ Just really surprised about the lack of research. I think we could do way better with announcing decisions, but if the few decisions which we announce are reported like this, then it is pretty logical if people get upset. -- Regards, Olav -- marketing-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
