Chip, 

Really like the article and awesome work you and others do on promoting CS.

Speaking of Secondary storage, I imagine this going to be asked quite 
frequently, can we support any other secondary store other than NFS backed ssvm?

Would you have any insight? Can we make secondary store totally independent of 
NFS?

Thanks
ilya

-----Original Message-----
From: Chip Childers [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2013 10:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Linux.com's article

Another one:

http://www.linux.com/news/enterprise/cloud-computing/711234-cloudstack-ups-enterprise-credibility-with-apache-top-level-status

I especially appreciated this article, because Stephen O'Grady and Jay Lyman 
said things that I think are both complementary and appropriate.
As much as we want to make our voices heard, I'm a *stong* proponent of staying 
positive and being complementary of similar OSS projects.  The OpenStack 
Foundation, for example, is doing great work.  We can continue to include Swift 
storage as a valuable secondary storage plugin option, and perhaps we'll find 
ways to take advantage of other work going on there.  The same goes for 
OpenNebula.  Frankly, I hope that we can pick back up on the little bit of 
momentum Sebastian seemed to have started to get ACS and the Open Nebula market 
place working together.

Jay's quotes were also very similar to the verbal discussion we had this 
morning.  I think that smart analysts like these two are the ones that we want 
to continue to foster relationships with.

Yes, perhaps this opinion feeds some of the trolls out there (I've seen several 
people comment that we sounded to "friendly", which is apparently a bad thing), 
but I see it as a position of strength for our community.

Sorry about a little bit of a rambling email there, but the thoughts above can 
be generalized into how I see us continuing to craft messages around our 
project:  user focused and willing OSS collaborators.

-chip


Reply via email to