Some of the other branding documentation could be useful, both as a starting point for this effort, and as something we can/should consider linking to, as a foundational policy that we are building on.
Specifically, for third-parties: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/ http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/events.html http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/domains.html http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/merchandise.html And for us: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/responsibility http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/reporting.html On 4 April 2013 02:05, Kimihiko Kitase <[email protected]> wrote: > "(TM) is not used" means (TM) is not used in the image of log, although > trademark of logo is registered trademarks of ASF. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kimihiko Kitase [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 9:58 AM > To: [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Draft trademark guidelines > > Hello > > I registered cloudstack-marketing alias today, so please correct me if its > already discussed. > > I think as text word, Apache CloudStack(TM) should be good, but (TM) is > not used for logo usually... > And also it should be better to use cloud monkey "Cloudy" into logo. > > See Hadoop and Cassandra for example.. > http://hadoop.apache.org/ > http://cassandra.apache.org/ > > Thanks > Kimi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 8:38 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Draft trademark guidelines > > Hey Guys, > > I posted a version of the Apache CloudStack logo with the TM in the > comments of the link below. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Trademark+Guidelines+%28DRAFT%29?focusedCommentId=30760434&#comment-30760434 > > Did we still want to keep the open source cloud computing tagline? > > Let me know. > > Thanks You and Best Regards, > > Sonny H. Chhen > Manager of User Interface & User Experience | Citrix Systems – > CloudPlatform > 4988 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mathias Mullins [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2013 3:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Draft trademark guidelines > > Just thought about it as well. "Cloudy" the name of the Character should > be in name or place be at least ™ SM or ®. > > Matt > > > > > > > On 2/26/13 5:05 PM, "Mathias Mullins" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >I think you also need to add "CloudStack, Open Source Cloud Computing" > >as one of the trademarked phrases as well. If it's in the Logo, then > >the verbiage has to be covered too. > > > >Matt > > > > > > > > > >On 2/26/13 5:00 PM, "David Nalley" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >>On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Chip Childers > >><[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 04:55:37PM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Feb 26, 2013, at 3:34 PM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > Hi folks, > >>>> > > >>>> > Sorry for spamming two lists. > >>>> > > >>>> > We've been drafting some guidelines and had them reviewed by > >>>> > trademarks@ - and wanted to get them out in public for comment > >>>> > and discussion. > >>>> > > >>>> > Draft is here: > >>>> > > >>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Trademark+Gui > >>>>del > >>>>i > >>>>nes+(DRAFT) > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> Reading it, it seems that we need to change the logos to have the > >>>>symbol ? > >>> > >>> Yes, I think it does. > >>> > >> > >>Yes - most definitely. > >> > >>>> Does this also mean that on the website and docs we need to have > >>>>the ® symbol every time we write CloudStack® ? > >>> > >>> Probably, yes. Or at least (and I'm no expert) assert the mark's > >>> ownership in the docs somewhere. > >>> > >> > >>Asserting once per doc should be fine. We have a section for this > >>explicitly in our documentation. (the publican brand stuff - I'll be > >>updating that shortly) > > > > -- NS
