Requests for approval should be made to the PMC, not the marketing@ list. The marketing@ list is a convenience tool only. The PMC is the body that makes the approvals. Or am I misunderstanding something?
On 4 April 2013 15:52, Chip Childers <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 10:45:15AM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need to request approval for two events that I have been working on, > according to our trademark policy guidelines: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Trademark+Guidelines+(DRAFT) > > > > *Citrix would like to donate sponsoring of HPDC: > > http://hpdc.org/2013/ > > HPDC is an Academic conference on distributed systems, the sponsoring is > for the best paper awards. The current CloudStack logo is already listed on > the website and can be replaced by the new one with the proper trademarks > symbol if needed. The CloudStack community would get a table, with table > cloth with cloudstack logo, pop-up banner with cloudstack logo, and handout > tee-shirts with cloudstack logo for free. > > > > *Citrix would like to donate silver sponsorship of DevOps Days Amsterdam: > > http://devopsdays.org/events/2013-amsterdam/ > > CloudStack community would get table/pop-up banner/handout free > tee-shirts with cloudstack logo > > > > I am also working on other events where there is no sponsoring (in the > sense of paid sponsoring), and I would like to list the one for which I > received acceptance notification: > > > > *I got approval for an Apache CloudStack "project" presence at LinuxTag > (Berlin May 22-25) > > http://www.linuxtag.org/2013/ > > CloudStack community would get table/pop-up banner/handout free > tee-shirts with cloudstack logo > > > > At least one Apache CloudStack Committer will be present at these events. > > > > -Sebastien > > Sebastien, > > I'm +1 to these, and I believe we can assume a 72 hour "no objection" > approach to approval. > > When you check with ConCom, let us know how it goes there. Also, if > they disagree with being asked about this sort of thing we should change > our docs... ;-) > -- NS
