Sorry, I'm a bit late to this thread.

I've found an apache cloudstack logo and added to my site, 
http://www.cloudsand.com/content - also added TM mark.

Does that look inline?

Thanks
ilya

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Nalley [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 3:30 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] CloudStack Collaboration Conference NA '13 Invitation
> Card
> 
> The Apache CloudStack logo doesn't seem to be any of the logos we've used
> previously, or any of the proposed logos that I see on the draft trademarks
> page. Particularly the odd (to me) placement of the TM symbol. Apache,
> CloudStack, and Apache CloudStack are trademarks of the ASF - so it just
> feels weird.
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Karen Vuong <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As you may already know, the CloudStack Collaboration Conference
> > (North
> > America) will be held on June 23-25th, 2013. The website will be up on
> > April 19th. I wanted to help spread the word about the conference and
> > we have a couple of meetups and expos where CloudStack will be
> > participating at. I thought we could pass invitations out at the booth
> > and meetups as a way to invite them to the conference. I created this
> > postcard and I just wanted to get your thoughts on the idea!
> >
> > I was planning on handing them out at:
> >
> > - CloudTech Conference in Mountain View, CA:
> > http://www.meetup.com/cloudcomputing/events/111082032/
> > - CloudStack meetup - "Storage in Apache CloudStack" in Santa Clara, CA:
> > http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-SF-Bay-Area-Users-
> Group/events/108916
> > 562/
> > - I could send them to Ilya to handout at the meetups that he
> > organizes in New York -
> > http://www.meetup.com/CloudStack-NYC-User-Group/
> >
> > Here is the invitation postcard design (front and back):
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Graphics+and+R
> e
> > sources
> >
> > I would welcome any feedback or suggestions. Thanks!
> >
> > Karen
> >
> >

Reply via email to