Arjan, your attachment was stripped. On Dec 5, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Arjan Eriks <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kirk e.a., > > I made an attempt to see if that could work out Kirk, see attached (only for > reference purposes, this is not design stuff). Please check. I sized it small. > > But in general you see two types of usage of "Powered by" logos. 1) as an > extra glued to the bottom of a different companies logo and 2) as some sort > of seal (like intel inside). Shouldnt we make both versions? > > Then as a general feedback on the submission (and mine attempt as well). I do > feel that we should make this first time right. So lets please keep iterating > and ask for more submissions. Our image is important. > > Thanks, A > > > On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <[email protected]> wrote: > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the > idea) > > > Regards, > > Kirk Jantzer > http://about.me/kirkjantzer > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <[email protected]>wrote: > > > I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical > > stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top > > right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without > > the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between > > the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud. > > > > sorry to nag, > > Daan > > > > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Sending version 0.0.3: > > > - Complete monkey added > > > - "Apache" added > > > - Clouds more like the original logo > > > This also comes with some cons: > > > - 4 colors > > > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1 > > > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable, > > even > > > the monkey is so-so. > > > > > > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to > > > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud. > > > > > > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg, > > spot > > > the difference :-) > > > > > > Your feedback is welcome! > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Laszlo > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> I like, > > >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there. > > >> I think it must even. > > >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well > > >> > > >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <[email protected]> > > >> >> To: [email protected] > > >> >> Cc: [email protected] > > >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM > > >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for > > CloudStack > > >> >> > > >> >> Hi, > > >> >> > > >> >> Here is my version: > > >> >> - SVG format as you requested > > >> >> - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I > > prefer > > >> >> few > > >> >> colors for such pictures > > >> >> - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs > > to > > >> >> fit > > >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the > > >> >> monkey is übercool anyway) > > >> >> - if no monkey, then cloud > > >> >> - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make > > >> >> difficult to read in such a small place > > >> >> - see attached file :) > > >> > > > >> > Hi, > > >> > > > >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to > > be > > >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so > > cute.) > > >> > > > >> > Two things - > > >> > > > >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared > > >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's > > intentional, not > > >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my > > screen... :) > > >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to > > >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it > > shouldn't > > >> > be added in... legal, etc)? > > >> > > > >> > -robyn > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> > Hi folks: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent (I have none) I > > >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :) > > >> >> > > > >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy to consume, and > > is > > >> >> > also attractive. > > >> >> > > > >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos: > > >> >> > > > >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000 > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png > > >> >> > > > >> >> > A couple of constraints: > > >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could, but lets not; it > > >> >> > will make life simpler) > > >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source (this allows us > > to > > >> >> > scale/etc) > > >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is vastly different > > >> >> > that > > >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email agreement > > around > > >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't as scary as > > >> >> > that > > >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.) > > >> >> > > > >> >> > Anyone interested? > > >> >> > > > >> >> > --David > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> -- > > >> >> > > >> >> EOF > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > EOF > > >
