On 4/28/16 12:53 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> On Apr 28, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Sunando Bhattacharya <suna...@indiqus.com> >> wrote: >> >> I really don’t know on what basis we are saying that openstack doesn’t work… >> $3.4Bill of revenues !!! > > So I am of the opinion that “openstack works” just because some friends at > CERN have it working.… > > But $3.4B of revenues is just pure bullocks ….. > > Except if you equate IBM and HP cloud business as Openstack revenues. > >> >> Fact is openstack is production-grade and catching up fast on most counts >> with ACS, and actually ahead on some features like NFV. Have you seen Nuage implementation of NFV with CloudStack? If not, its worth trying it out.
> > What about Bi-modal IT and Devops, is Openstack catching up there too ? > >> >> Lets call a spade a spade >> Sunando Bhattacharya >> M +91 97111 52299 >> www.indiqus.com >> >> >> >> >> >> This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to >> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential >> and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the >> original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are >> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this >> communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been >> obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error, >> please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep >> e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are >> virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of >> viruses. >> >> >> On 28 April 2016 at 8:26:21 PM, Giles Sirett (giles.sir...@shapeblue.com) >> wrote: >> >>> +1 to that will >>> >>> Kind Regards >>> Giles >>> >>> D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055 >>> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com >>> >>> >>> giles.sir...@shapeblue.com >>> www.shapeblue.com >>> @shapeblue >>> >>> >>> On 28 Apr 2016, at 15:39, Will Stevens <williamstev...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Openstack is just bitter because they still don't have a product that >>>> works and our product works just fine. Just goes to show that more money >>>> doesn't always solve the problem... :) All that money and almost no >>>> success stories. Kind of sad really... >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Madan Ganesh Velayudham >>>> <madangan...@actonmagic.com> wrote: >>>> Greetings, >>>> >>>> Just bumped onto this article, thought of sharing: >>>> >>>> http://www.eweek.com/cloud/openstack-revenues-approaching-3.4b-451-research.html >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> The decision to turn over OpenStack to a foundation in 2012 stands in >>>> contrast to the CloudStack platform and its parent, Citrix. Citrix donated >>>> CloudStack to the Apache Software Foundation, but it was never set up with >>>> the same true, multi-stakeholder, stand-alone foundation as OpenStack's. >>>> >>>> "If Citrix would have done a foundation around CloudStack, we would now be >>>> at a Cloudstack Summit, not OpenStack Summit," Sadowski said." Sadowski >>>> said. >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>> The bold highlighted line was hurting a little bit! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Madan >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Madan Ganesh Velayudham >>>> Founder & CEO >>>> ActOnMagic >>>> >>>> Cloud Governance, Analytics, Management Simplified with ActOnCloud! >>>> www.actonmagic.com >
