answering to both of you in reverse order ... sry ... :) On 26 June 2014 11:14, Lena Reinhard <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for leaving out commercial projects in general, which doesn't mean we > could make exceptions if they make sense :) > I'd also be +1 for leaving this one out in terms of rather promoting > better accessible (= non-commercial) offers; still thanks for the > submission, Andy! > fine :) > (just for the record: Hoodie is and will remain Open Source and > non-commercial :) ) > yeah sure - I meant the service around Hoodie ... my comparison was not intended to arise a wrong view to Hoodie - sry if that was understood in this way > On 26.06.2014, at 11:09, Alexander Shorin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was mostly about that you need to pay first to pass these courses > > (or even see what they are about). I already have a chance to meet > > with this link, but didn't shared it because found a bit disrespectful > > to our users when we sharing such kind of stuff. > yes correct! > > As for Hoodie, they doesn't require any payments from you for the > > access to their source code repositories (: > yeah true! please see my note above ... Cheers Andy -- Andy Wenk Hamburg - Germany RockIt! GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
