Great, Mike.
With Cloudant - CoucnDB 2.0 replication addressed, the fear of IBM lock-in can
be eliminated.
The video is just great as it is!
Johs
> On 09 Jan 2015, at 01:55, Mike Broberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks, Johs. That's helpful. I'm not sure if we can fit it into the
> voice-over; however, I'll definitely be working on some marketing pieces that
> focus on Cloudant-Apache CouchDB replication in the coming months as CouchDB
> 2.0 is readied. And this is an important distinction to make, since we'll
> likely have many customers with this same question.
>
> In the meantime, I'll see what we can do with the V.O. Cheers, --Mike
> --
> Mike Broberg | IBM Cloudant | 200 State Street, Boston, MA 02109 |
> [email protected] | (617) 299-1409 Google Voice
> --
>
> Johs Ensby ---01/08/2015 01:46:55 AM---Great video and storytelling Mike! The
> only thing I am missing is a no-lock-in-assurance to the indi
>
> From: Johs Ensby <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Date: 01/08/2015 01:46 AM
> Subject: Re: Cloudant video approval?
>
>
>
> Great video and storytelling Mike!
>
> The only thing I am missing is a no-lock-in-assurance to the individual
> developer: the compatibility with CouchDB on the developer’s own device.
> I think replication compatibility is so important that it should not be
> treated as a covered by “API compliant".
>
> The reference to CouchDB in
> 01:35 "While Cloudant is compliant with the API compliant with CouchDB, our
> software…”
> Says nothing about ability to sync data to a local installation of CouchDB
> 2.x at the push of a button
>
> The reference to “yourself” in
> 01:59 “Run Cloudant yourself in your own data center…”
> is good for no-lock-in-assurance to the corporations and scaled-up startup,
> but you leave out the in-between, always being able to sync Cloudant to a
> local installation of CouchDB.
>
> Just to point out how this can be a source of confusion (Cloudant support
> Case 41635), when I asked about verification that data syncing would be
> unchanged after upgrade to CouchDB 2.0, your support responded with an answer
> on the API (as covered in the video), we had to clear it up and this was the
> response i was looking for and got:
>
> Apologies for misunderstanding your question - replication between Cloudant
> and CouchDB 2.0 is definitely compatible and can be triggered through the
> dashboard or through the use of the API code. If I am still not addressing
> your question, please let me know and if possible, provide any details as to
> what you are trying to do with Cloudant and CouchDB 2.0 replication.
>
> Could probably fit in as a rephrase of the sentence at 01:59.
>
> johs:)
>
>
>
> > On 07 Jan 2015, at 23:33, Mike Broberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Greetings, marketing community-- Cloudant is looking to produce an
> > explanation video of our service, and we'd like mention Apache CouchDB and
> > use the CouchDB logo, please.
> >
> > Here's a first draft of the video for review: http://cdurl.net/?u=R2T6W7
> > <http://cdurl.net/?u=R2T6W7>
> > (The video is short, but if you want to skip right to the CouchDB part
> > that's approximately 1:30 into the recording.)
> >
> > It is not posted publicly anywhere yet. We'd like your approval before
> > finishing it. I went ahead an copied Sally too. (Hi, Sally!)
> >
> > I'll also note that we need to add some legal bits to the end of the video.
> > Traditionally, we've used a statement like this one: "Apache", "Apache
> > CouchDB", and "CouchDB" are registered trademarks or trademarks of the
> > Apache Software Foundation in the United States and/or other countries.
> >
> > Please let me know what you think, and thanks very much! --Mike
> > --
> > Mike Broberg | IBM Cloudant | 200 State Street, Boston, MA 02109 |
> > [email protected] | (617) 299-1409 Google Voice
> > --
>
>
