Get your point, Jan
we ship with jQuery, though and as such ar in family with the "jQuery spagetti
community”.
Maybe a gallery with cookbook-style or “how to get started with CouchDB and
XYZ” posts would be the way to go?
johs
> On 13 Jan 2015, at 11:30, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:38 , Johs Ensby <j...@b2w.com> wrote:
>>
>> Not surprising, looking at google trends ew decline.
>> That is a pure buzz-index, of course, but what we need to do is to connect
>> it to an up-trend for a broad audience.
>> CouchDB needs to be if not the sister, so the cousin of nodejs and reactjs
>> or something else that is moving in the right direction.
>
> I’m not sure this the right approach. We should make sure we work with all
> these things, but I don’t think we should be getting into any family
> relationships with other projects (other than the ones that replicate). The
> surrounding technology comes and goes.
>
> Best
> Jan
> --
>
>> J
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Jan 2015, at 10:00, Jan Lehnardt <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Heya (excuse the HN link),
>>>
>>> this is not necessarily something for the weekly news, but I think this is
>>> a useful summary of how people think about CouchDB in the wild. I’m not
>>> suggesting this is representative, but it can help guide us in what we want
>>> to do for our marketing activities, if we are not happy with how people
>>> think about CouchDB:
>>>
>>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8865079
>>>
>>> I found the comment about design docs most interesting:
>>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8865687 (although I should send this
>>> to dev@). We should think hard about hiding this detail away from end-users.
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Jan
>>> --
>>>
>>
>
