Heya Mike, ASF lists don’t do attachments, can you put a link up somewhere? :)
Best Jan -- > On 05 Mar 2015, at 21:33, Mike Broberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greetings, marketing community-- Here's the paper we discussed, now in > official IBM layout (attached). > > Thanks for all the feedback and help! --Mike > -- > Mike Broberg | IBM Cloudant | 200 State Street, Boston, MA 02109 | > [email protected] | (617) 299-1409 Google Voice > -- > (See attached file: WUW12368-USEN-00_managedLocalCouchDB_v3.pdf) > > <graycol.gif>Mike Broberg---01/30/2015 08:11:16 AM---Hi, Andy-- Thanks! Our > messages crossed earlier. Sorry about that. Here's the updated version, minus > > From: Mike Broberg/Cambridge/IBM > To: [email protected] > Date: 01/30/2015 08:11 AM > Subject: Re: Draft of Cloudant paper, CouchDB inclusion? > > > Hi, Andy-- Thanks! Our messages crossed earlier. Sorry about that. > > Here's the updated version, minus "PouchDB" in the footer. Much appreciated. > --Mike > -- > Mike Broberg | IBM Cloudant | 200 State Street, Boston, MA 02109 | > [email protected] | (617) 299-1409 Google Voice > -- > [attachment "whitepaper_managedLocalCouchDB_v5-5.pdf" deleted by Mike > Broberg/Cambridge/IBM] > > > <graycol.gif>Andy Wenk ---01/30/2015 07:21:43 AM---Hi Mike, I like the paper > very much. It's a nice overview and will help people a > > From: Andy Wenk <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: 01/30/2015 07:21 AM > Subject: Re: Draft of Cloudant paper, CouchDB inclusion? > > > > Hi Mike, > > I like the paper very much. It's a nice overview and will help people a > lot. I also think that there is no need to "choose". It's more the thing > that one want's do find the best fit for the job. > > PouchDB is not an ASF project and is not integrated in Apache CouchDB. So > the footer should be changed accordingly. Even though - PouchDB is super > awesome ;-). > > Thanks a lot for this > > Cheers > > Andy > > On 29 January 2015 at 22:05, Sebastian Rothbucher < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm with Johs: one could point out that one can easily SWITCH between Couch > > 4 free, a fully commercial-backed Cloudant local and the cloud option as > > such. You can upgrade and you can also downgrade when you want to leave the > > cloud for some reason. Try that with SF.com! > > By the way: this also improves CouchDB's position as there is a > > commercially supported counterpart out - so great on another front also > > > > So thanks for summarizing these things! > > Sebastian > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Johs Ensby <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Mike, > > > Nice paper! It provides the kind of orientation that is essential to > > both > > > development strategy and deployment planning. The fact that it comes > > from a > > > major commercial player is a much needed reference on top of the usual > > > blog/twitter/youtube/Stackoverflow/Quora scanning to QC the > > > not-always-update online docs. > > > Two comments: > > > I would have expected a few more sentences promoting Cloudant sync (to > > > qualify for mobile use is essential these days) > > > Mentioning Hood.ie might be a good idea when addressing PouchDB, and as > > > there is a compatibility issue there at the moment when it comes to the > > > user database api between CouchDB and Cloudant (see > > > https://github.com/hoodiehq/faq/issues/77). I think the Hoodie > > initiative > > > deserves a mention since it ties together your “additional replication > > > endponts” issue with the node.js world and makes the offline vision a > > > practical reality > > > > > > A final comment as a Cloudant fan (since i met with the team in Boston in > > > 2009) > > > You paper title is: > > > Deciding Between Cloudant Managed Service, Cloudant Local, and Apache > > > CouchDB™ > > > .. and one of your best arguments is that you DON’T need to decide > > between > > > Cloudant and A-CouchDB. > > > Isn’t that a good point emphasize in the conclusion of the paper? > > > > > > johs:) > > > > > > > > > > On 27 Jan 2015, at 17:48, Mike Broberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, marketing community-- I'm working on a short paper that outlines > > > the differences between Cloudant's various services, and would like to > > > include Apache CouchDB alongside them as an option. > > > > > > > > A draft of the copy is available for comments at > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-t8xRXnMqHYJi2PcxHzX3By3eoZUkWxzKqQg5K3tLbU/edit?usp=sharing > > > < > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-t8xRXnMqHYJi2PcxHzX3By3eoZUkWxzKqQg5K3tLbU/edit?usp=sharing > > > > > > I also included a potential layout of the document (attached) so you can > > > see how the images might look. (Disclaimer: I am not a graphic designer.) > > > > > > > > A couple notes: > > > > > > > > I wasn't sure how to handle PouchDB. I lumped it in with the ASF > > > trademarks statement in the draft, but I'm not sure if it applies. So I'm > > > copying the ASF trademarks team here on that. Or, maybe this is a > > question > > > for Dale, Nolan, etc.? > > > > Also, I wrote this draft with an eye on the near future, anticipating > > > clustering in Apache CouchDB. > > > > > > > > Ideally, I'd like to consolidate feedback from the community by the end > > > of this week. Please let me know if you anticipate needing more time. > > Thank > > > you! --Mike > > > > -- > > > > Mike Broberg | IBM Cloudant | 200 State Street, Boston, MA 02109 | > > > [email protected] | (617) 299-1409 Google Voice > > > > -- > > > > (See attached file: whitepaper_managedLocalCouchDB_v4.pdf) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Andy Wenk > Hamburg - Germany > RockIt! > > GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588 > > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
