Joan, corrected my post on https://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=4547164 <https://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=4547164> accordingly johs
> On 24 Mar 2015, at 03:12, Joan Touzet <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks, Johs. I proposed this approach during the weekly IRC meeting > last week, and the PMC members present agreed. We reviewed the discussion > on the PMC mailing list and Robert took the great action of writing > it up and formalising it for this list. > > Teamwork! > > -Joan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Johs Ensby" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 7:54:48 PM > Subject: Re: [NOTICE] CouchDB logo process & decision > > Community is fantastic, especially with a healthy dose of leadership > Like this:) > johs > >> On 24 Mar 2015, at 00:20, Robert Kowalski <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> I would like to give you an update regarding the process for the new >> logo design. Sorry that it took so long and for the confusion, but we >> finally found a way to decide on the logo and move forward regarding >> this topic. The process will have three steps: >> >> >> Step 1 - You can still submit proposals and we will also propose the >> old CouchDB logo as a possible candidate until April 5 >> >> >> Step 2 - We will then run a public vote for all committers on this >> mailing list ([email protected]) (see “Non-technical >> decision” in our bylaws [1]) by April 20. This vote will inform the >> decision made in Step 3. >> >> >> Step 3 - The PMC will vote on a final decision by May 18, which will >> take the public vote as significant input. The PMC can decide to go >> with the results of the public vote, or make its own choice. >> >> >> [1] http://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#types >
