@Alexander can't understand exactly what you mean... would you like to have all current and future CouchDB content within the CouchDB docs? Couldn't it be a strong limitation for writers and their freedom?
Of course, a single source of truth is great, but I think it can't cover any kind of topic. Unfortunately the Internet is full of outdated content, is in its nature, but maybe is its power too. I think CouchDB has a very good reference manual. By expanding it with everything, wouldn't it be too hard to write and above all to mantain up to date? 2015-05-04 18:21 GMT+02:00 Alexander Shorin <[email protected]>: > On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:10 PM, Giovanni Lenzi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Don't you think CouchDB can have great benefits out of it? > > I do, but most of them worth to have in CouchDB docs instead in order > to provide single source of truth which will evolve with CouchDB and > will not repeat old mistakes when a lot of pretty good articles around > of the personal blogs eventually became outdated for today. How do you > feel turning your proposal in such way? (; > > -- > ,,,^..^,,, >
