great - thanks!! On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Johs Ensby <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 on using Twitter for this > I can volunteer to make a proposal for the staging and follow-up by PMC -- > that needs to be in place for this not to go wrong also > for AFS compliance, reports could be made on the mailing list. > > Johs > > > On 16. sep. 2015, at 14.42, ermouth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> what went wrong? > >> how and where do we collect ideas about a slogan? > > > > ML is unsuitable – low engagement, no navigation, zillions of cluttering > >>>>> in replies, inability to participate if you subscribed after topic > was > > issued and so on. Only flaming enthuziasts can use this tool, all others > > just pass by. Apache better understand it, enforcing usage of this tool. > > > > And even for enthuziasts it‘s hard to track topics, splitted into several > > threads. You can only do it only in inbox – all web UI are even more > ugly. > > > >> Imo this should be a form where > > > > Form seems too much for slogan. Twitter is enough good, restricts length > > and provides perfect engagement. If you ask on twi (and do it at least > > three times taking in account timezones), I think you could receive a lot > > of good new slogans. > > > > Since slogans all are short, it wouldn‘t be hard to create short list – > > about 10-15-20 positions I think. > > > > For final poll there exist a lot of online instruments. Also voting > should > > hide poll results for person until he or she votes – it titillates > person‘s > > curiosity and motivates to make a click. Option ‘I do not want to vote, > > want to see results’ is also good to ensure you‘ll have no random clicks > > just to uncover current results. > > > >> what did we discuss if most of the proposals are voted with -1 > > > > It only means that both options proposed for voting are weak. > > > > BR > > > > ermouth > >
