Thanks for your comment, Thorsten. > The cuts and different colors make it harder to see an "LO" in the > symbol. True, but you get a flower for that ;-). No, I see what you mean. But what about the weights for L and O? Is it better that way?
> Writer/Calc/Impress/Base being 4 parts shouldn't be expressed in the > logo. Neither 5 if you add Draw. The parts are not equally large, > complex, important, independent or well known. Long term, I would not > bet on the number of components staying the same. Well, but Writer/Calc/Impress/Base are the main program parts and have always been, as far as I can remember. Also, another famous office suite from Redmont uses it: http://tinyurl.com/2apzn2d And I must disagree, these are exactly the four parts people look for when switching from MS Office to LibO. Where's Word? Excel? PowerPoint? And Access? > However, the concept of parts building a whole is a worthwhile theme for > representing both/either the community effort and/or the fact that it's > a suite of applications. I agree and think such a logo also communicates integration of four software parts into one suite. But nevertheless, I'm really craving for a comment on the TEXT of the logo and the way I changed it. (The fact that I haven't closed the f bar to the i is on purpose; try it - it looks too much like a block to me, making the ffi stick out in a negative way. Keeping it separate looks much better to me.). Joey -- E-mail to [email protected] for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
