You might have taken it the wrong way but i think a LOT of people here read it the same way as you. Difficult to read it any other way!
The SlashDot one and the original it quotes from is trickier. Sometimes slating us and sometimes praising. A much better article entirely. Regards from Tom :) ________________________________ From: Charles-H. Schulz <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Wed, 26 January, 2011 13:26:18 Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] PC world article Hello, the coverage of LibreOffice 3.3 is generally good, and the span of the coverage (the number of written articles) is excellent. Anyone , any journalist is entitled to his/her own opinion, but this article is somewhat problematic. I usually read these articles and their comments carefully. They are often good sources to understand the "outside" perception of an OSS project or product. Yet I don't manage to find one point that is not sheer and free criticism of LibreOffice in this one. http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/217679/libreoffice_33_handson_with_the_free_office_suite.html My question might be naive so bear on with me: how can we avoid this amount of crap ? "it's really only good for Open Source Developers but not in real life" That's not journalism that's prejudice. "I miss SharePoint"..WTF? Your comments are welcome (note: I might have taken the issue in a completely wrong way). Best, -- Charles-H. Schulz Membre du Comité exécutif The Document Foundation. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
