On 03/23/2011 10:52 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote: > On 3/23/11 3:35 PM, Kinshuk Sunil wrote: > >> Do we have any licensing guideline for Marketing materials? > > No. I use Creative Commons CC-BY-SA because is known outside the > software world (although in a very limited way). I do not use the GFDL > because a presentation does not belong to the documentation category.
Surely we agree this is instructional material, the presentation is its supporting material. that's why I sometimes use GFDL for presentations. > > FSF states that: "The GFDL was designed for manuals, textbooks, other > reference and instructional materials, and documentation which often > accompanies GNU software". > [...] > Slideshare is very popular, and presentations published on SlideShare > are usually picked up by search engines and are easier to find by > people outside the software industry. > As I wrote, when you publish there **only**, problems outweigh the benefits. Once again, we should not publish ONLY to SaaS sites that have restrictive, changing terms of use & conditions. "It's popular" is about the least valid argument for putting content **only** in such sites. My ***personal*** preference is to not publish on such sites at all. Cheers, Fabian -- Fabián Rodríguez http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/User:MagicFab -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
