On 8 Jun 2011, at 14:27, Tom Davies wrote: > > Hi :) > I don't know how this is all going to work and there are likely to be changes > after the elections anyway. Perhaps the named person could be a Team Leader > delegating some of the work to other agreed people. In co-operatives that i > have worked in the SC would need to be voted-in first. Then the SC would > delegate areas of responsibility to various groups such as "Marketing" and > decide how people would be elected or appointed within those groups. Ideally > (imo) the groups would be allowed to choose a suitable way for themselves > (within reason). Initially groups would communicate with SC about what area > they need to be in control of and which they only need to communicate with. > For > example they might decide that the Design sub-group is better under a > different > group's control but is a sub-group they might want to have a few members in > so > that communications are smoother. There are a lot of issues here that might > change until TDF settle on something that works more smoothly.
If I had to invent something, it would be along the lines of a Communications Working Group that was open to membership from anyone who would agree to its rules (confidentiality until release, have media training, communicate only the group consensus as TDF's position, for example). I would then use the mail alias of that Working Group as the press contact on any releases, and have the most qualified member pick up each inbound request. S. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
