I guess this is mostly for Italo or anyone else who is well informed:
I am just wondering about this. I am seeing a larger number of devs pronouncing themselves on their work being of MPL/LGPLv3+ dual licence. From a marketing point of view, is there anything that we should be prepared to answer if asked of the reason behind LibreOffice being offered under this dual licence?
* Why the dual Licence and what does the MPL offer that the LGPLv3+ does not?
* Our download page states the following in the footer: "This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPLv3)." Should this be updated?
* I imagine that the first part of the footer: "Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License." does not need updating.
Thanks for any info. Cheers, Marc -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
