IIRC there is more on that Ref Cards page than just the list of files, so "moving the page" may not be the optimal solution. When I get back on my computer later today, I'll look at how I think it might be best to handle it. Ron or you (Marc) may have an idea too; I'm not trying to be boss here. :-) BTW, we at Docs are planning more changes in our section, in hope of improving usability for both contributors and users; how and where we list the Ref Cards would fit into that reorganisation.
--Jean On 23/01/2013, at 6:35, Marc Paré <[email protected]> wrote: > As this is still all pretty fresh in people's mind, I suggest we go ahead and > move the page now. We will just have to readjust our links which is no big > deal. > > Marc > > Le 2013-01-22 15:15, Jean Weber a écrit : >> Ron Faile is a member of the Documentation Team. He did most of the work on >> the first set of user guides; you'll find his name in Contributors section >> of the Copyright page. >> >> I don't see a problem with him working primarily through the Marketing team, >> though perhaps the results of his work should be listed in detail on the >> Docs/Pubs pages instead of the Docs page having just a link to where the >> completed ref cards are. >> >> --Jean >> >> On 22/01/2013, at 23:23, Tom Davies<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi :) >>> Would it be best to move this project to the Documentation Team in the >>> future or is it really a marketing issue in the longer-term? Seems like >>> there is an element of both in any documentation. Getting attractive >>> documentation out there and being seen by people seems to help give more >>> confidence in LibreOffice and TDF as a whole and raises the profile of the >>> whole project. >>> >>> Regards from >>> >>> Tom :) >>> >>> >>>> ________________________________ >>>> From: Marc Paré<[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Sent: Tuesday, 22 January 2013, 10:12 >>>> Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Reference Cards >>>> >>>> Hi Ron, >>>> >>>> Le 2013-01-21 16:52, Ron Faile a écrit : >>>>> On 1/21/2013 6:10 AM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: >>>>>> On 13-01-20 03:56 PM, Ron Faile wrote: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> One important detail I noticed in my printing tests, the LibreOffice >>>>>> logo on the left seems to be low-resolution, which results in poor print >>>>>> quality. Can this be fixed? Most people may not notice but it's low >>>>>> enough resolution that it looks blurry even on the screen when I open >>>>>> the PDF. I am using evince 3.4.0 in Trisquel if that matters, a Windows >>>>>> version is available here: http://www.pdfreaders.org. >>>>>> >>>>>> I would do this correction myself on a single document but there are 16 >>>>>> variations of it that would need to be >>>>>> corrected/re-generated/re-uploaded, and I will most surely forget some >>>>>> detail (fonts, etc.) that will make it look different. I will be looking >>>>>> into translating some of these so if this isn't fixed by release I will >>>>>> take the time to do it. Mentioning any extra fonts used (if any) and >>>>>> linking to the high-resolution version of the logos on that same page >>>>>> may be useful for translators too in the near future. I love the >>>>>> instructions on the back too :) >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe there was some recent discussion about measuring the # of >>>>>> downloads for another document and the difficulty of doing this on the >>>>>> Wiki. It will be important to measure how many downloads there are for >>>>>> these variations of the PDF, so in the future we can focus on those that >>>>>> are most used / drop those that aren't at all. What do you think? >>>>>> >>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>> >>>>>> Fabian >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Fabian. Yes the logo is low-resolution. There are some >>>>> higher-resolution versions on the wiki and I'll work on replacing them >>>>> and uploading the new files. The only problem with the SVG that Daniel >>>>> suggested is that it has a purpleish background. I'm not a graphic >>>>> designer, so I'm not sure if I'll be able to use it. If someone who >>>>> knows more about it can create a transparent version, I'll be happy to >>>>> use it. >>>>> >>>>> I agree that we may not need all 16 variations, we just need some info >>>>> on which are the most used. If you have any suggestions about which ones >>>>> to focus on, we can discuss it. Liberation Sans is the only font used in >>>>> the 4.0 cards. It is installed by default when you install LibreOffice. >>>>> I'm glad you're interested in translating the cards. It will be a >>>>> benefit to many of our users. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ron >>>> >>>> Thanks for the updates to the cards! I have linked to the wiki reference >>>> cards page from our "Marketing/Design Visual Elements" wiki page[1]. >>>> >>>> I also agree that it would be nice to update the logo to a higher >>>> definition. >>>> >>>> Re: measuring the downloads, I believe that piwik has been enabled on >>>> the wiki and that it is now possible to monitor such things as >>>> downloads. But, you would have to get help from someone who knows more >>>> about it than I do. >>>> >>>> Thanks again, these are good marketing items to have in a booth and of >>>> course as educational aids in a classroom setting or computer lab for >>>> students. >>>> >>>> Let us know when the logo is updated and I will make sure our l10n teams >>>> know of them. >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Marc >>>> >>>> [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Visual_Elements >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Marc Paré >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://www.parEntreprise.com >>>> parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF) >>>> parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org >>>> >> -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
