Hi :)
It is possible to stop the underlinings and blue links.  I do it by brute force 
just by reformatting the links to force them out of having underlinings.  I 
could do a more elegant way by changing the settings in 
Tools - Options - Appearance
but that might mess up other things for me so i don't.  Besides it gives me a 
chance to say brute force as though i had some muscle.  
Regards from 
Tom :)  







>________________________________
> From: Marc Paré <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Sent: Wednesday, 8 May 2013, 16:12
>Subject: [libreoffice-marketing] Re: Official/Community pamphlet types 
>proposals
> 
>
>Le 08/05/13 10:42 AM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster a écrit :
>
>>
>> I tend to use the PDF version to do most of my printing. I create the
>> documents and then make a PDF version that can be printed on any system,
>> with or without LO installed.
>>
>> So if you make a PDF version with "clickable" options, make sure they
>> can be printed without any problems.
>>
>> As I stated earlier, most professional places prefer PDF files for their
>> printing, when they do low count prints.  I tend to print the brochures
>> myself, but sometimes it is worth the extra costs from a printing
>> service, since they can use a machine to do the folding.  Every fold 150
>> brochures at one time?  I did andfor heavy stock paper it is worth the
>> cost for the machine folding.
>>
>> Also, some printing services would charge more for the "official"
>> brochure than the "community" brochure, due to the large block of ink on
>> the "front" panel.
>>
>
>Hmm, how about it we labelled it in such a way as to make it clear to 
>people that the .pdf version was an electronic version specifically 
>optimized for electronic posting and not for printing? We could list the 
>reasons why it is not preferable to use this version for printing ... 
>underlined links throughout the brochure which would make for an ugly print!
>
>We can then advise that anyone wishing to print any of the 
>print-optimized version to take care of this on their own. At least this 
>will allow the people printing the .odf version to have a little more 
>control over the .pdf version for their print jobs.
>
>Do you think this would be OK?
>
>Cheers,
>
>Marc
>
>-- 
>Marc Paré
>[email protected]
>http://www.parEntreprise.com
>parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
>parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org
>
>
>-- 
>To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
>Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
>Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
>List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
>All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
>
>
>
-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to