On 01/12/13 17:55, Robinson Tryon wrote: > In the case of OOXML, "Microsoft published the specs for XML file > formats in 2003 and licensed them to competitors" may be correct, but > I feel like that sentence is a bit misleading for ODF or other non-MS > XML document formats. Perhaps just dropping the sentence altogether > might be preferable.
The statement is not correct, by the way, because the format is not licensed but is free to use based on a statement provided in 2008 at the time of OOXML standardization. -- Italo Vignoli - [email protected] mob +39.348.5653829 - sip/jabber [email protected] skype italovignoli - hangout/jabber [email protected] -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
