On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Kevin Fenzi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:13:43 +0530 > Rahul Sundaram <[email protected]> wrote: > > > You might want to note two things. A) It is fully compatible with > > RHEL 6 and does not replace or conflict with anything in the base > > repository and that EPEL enforces this via a policy. B) This is a > > community repository and not commercially supported by Red Hat. > > ok. How about a second paragraph that reads: > > EPEL6 packages never replace RHEL6 packages, only build on them and > are fully compatible with RHEL6. EPEL is a community supported and > maintained project, and it's packages are not commercially supported by > Red Hat. > > Or should that read better at the end? > I would suggest: EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on repository and provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is a community project maintained and supported by volunteers (via bugzilla and mailing lists) as part of the Fedora Project and is not commercially supported by Red Hat. Rahul
-- marketing mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
