Toshio, I would be happy to participate in the meetings so I can provide insight into what may be more or less successful methodologies from a clearance perspective.
Pam Chestek On 5/9/2012 4:39 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > At the last Board Meeting, the Board looked at the poll results asking > whether people felt like continuing to name releases. The results seemed > to show that many people do like having a name associated with Fedora > releases. However, the discussion before and after has shown there is > a desire to improve upon the current method of selecting the names. > > The Board decided that it would be worthwhile to come up with a new > procedure for selecting the name for the Fedora 19 release and beyond to > attempt to solve some of the issues that have been brought up. The Board > is looking for volunteers who would like to do two things: > > (1) Answer the following questions: > > * What benefits does the Project get from the current release naming > process? > * What changes do people want to see in a revised process? > > (2) Come up with at least one proposal and analyze it according to the > answers to the previous questions. > > If anyone is interested in coming to a weekly meeting to work on this, > please feel free to contact me. If anyone would like to champion this, > please contact me ASAP so I know whether there is someone else who's going > to champion this or if I need to lead the effort. > > I've put up a wiki page that tries to summarize the answers to the first two > questions that I've seen circulated on the advisory-board mailing list and a > link to the only proposal I currently know of (mizmo's proposal to use > a single theme for all of the new Fedora releases). > > Thanks, > -Toshio > > > _______________________________________________ > advisory-board mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/advisory-board
-- marketing mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
