On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Robyn Bergeron <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > I would *personally* prefer the most restrictive of the CC licenses (CC > > BY-NC-ND 4.0): > > > > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ > > > #2: CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 is listed in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensingas > a license that isn't acceptable for Fedora. I realize you're citing 4.0 > here, and we don't have guidance on 4.0 in the wiki, but I have to imagine > it's not going to be much of a change. The NC part is still NC... as you > said, it's the most restrictive, and at least in my opinion, > restrictiveness isn't exactly freedom-enabling :) > > > As mentioned on the marketing list earlier, the Red Hat legal team wrote terms of use for us, which croberts thinks must have gotten deleted in a migration/upgrade. But they specify Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/>("CC-BY-SA"). Ruth
-- marketing mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
