On Jan 27, 2015 6:37 AM, "Joe Brockmeier" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 01/26/2015 11:23 PM, Chris Roberts wrote: > > I am +1 to this as well, There has not been that many "unique" authors > > and its tied to their fas so if we decided to go this route I can send > > an email to them asking if its ok. > > I'm almost sure we've had this conversation before. Can somebody go > through the archives and see if we've reached a conclusion, before we go > off and do something that might be contradictory? > > There may also be a Fedora-wide contribution policy, and we also don't > want to contradict that. > > Finally, we ought to have this up on the wiki: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Magazine/Howtopost > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Magazine > > I believe this is the specific license used by the wiki: > > https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/ > > Is there a way that the author can do an "I agree to this license" > checkbox or something the first time they sign in/contribute? > > Best, > > jzb > -- >
The fedora-wide contribution policy, per the current CLA, is ~"default to CC-BY-SA unless specifically stated otherwise." Under those terms, all magazine posts have inherited CC-BY-SA; the magazine just didn't present the licensing info. --Pete
-- marketing mailing list [email protected] List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
