I just said about an image because this way the article looks a bit boring at first sight. It was just that.
Cheers, Sylvia On Wednesday, 8 June 2016, Justin W. Flory <jflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/08/2016 03:48 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > >> >> On 8 Jun 2016 19:30, "Sylvia Sánchez" <lailah...@gmail.com >> <mailto:lailah...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi Justin! >>> >>> I would say it needs an image or two. Besides that, I find it perfect. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> The last I recall from the previous editorial meeting is that the >> graphical update method would not be highlighted as a primary supported >> update and would at best be a "this thing is coming soon" target... >> >> Then a later more detailed article would be published to coincide with >> FESCO being happy with that as a supported update method. >> >> We should check with FESCO on this before publishing as nirik was pretty >> clear I thought that we should not publish such an article until they >> give the go ahead. >> >> > Hey James, I thought the decision would be to highlight this for upgrading > as long as it was ready, tested, tried, and true. In either case, including > this method in the article is completely dependent on the FESCo decision, > and in the event that it is not ready in time for release, we will modify > and strip this part of the article out. > > We definitely will not publish this method unless we have a clear answer > from FESCo and can be assured that the large majority of users will be able > to upgrade using this method successfully. For now, the way the article is > structured, it will be easy to remove this method if it isn't ready. > > -- > Cheers, > Justin W. Flory > jflo...@gmail.com > >
-- Fedora Marketing mailing list marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org
