On 27 July 2016 at 12:00, Justin W. Flory <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/26/2016 10:22 AM, [email protected] wrote: > >> >> >> On 29 June 2016 at 22:10, Justin W. Flory <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On 06/28/2016 11:35 PM, [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> On 29 June 2016 at 02:13, Justin W. Flory <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: >> >> On 06/27/2016 11:33 AM, [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> >> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am just wondering how can we promote improvement in >> Fedora >> 24 from >> G11N side. We have already drafted major points in Wiki. >> [1] >> Do you think having post in Magazine good here? Any >> other >> ideas? :) >> >> Thanks, >> Pravin Satpute >> >> >> >> 1.https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/G11N/Fedora_24_Talking_points >> (Created >> new page, since General talk page was more on products >> side and >> IMO G11N >> was not fitting well into it.) >> >> >> Hey Pravin! >> >> Regarding your original idea, are you meaning to say you'd >> like to >> get feedback from everyday users about translations and >> feedback in >> Fedora to see their opinions? >> >> >> That will be great, to get these kind of feedback. Presently we >> are very >> much dependent on testing day and bugzilla. >> >> >> >> Looking at the wiki page, it seems like more of an update on >> the >> internationalization / globalization efforts going on in >> Fedora, >> which is awesome! For this data, though, I would probably >> publish on >> the Community Blog instead of the Magazine. We could >> probably do a >> short "pointer" post on the Magazine to the CommBlog article >> to >> increase some outside exposure from users there too. >> >> >> Actually, i was interested to tweak this information from magazine >> perspective but agree with you by saying present contents suits to >> communityblog :) >> I will prepare first draft, may be this week and then we can >> again think >> again about suitability. I am happy with both case (Magazine or >> Communityblog with pointer in Magazine) >> >> Thanks, >> Pravin Satpute >> >> >> I think either way would work well. Depending on the angle you want >> to take (or maybe even both), we could try putting out an article >> about this on either platform. If you want to write something up on >> one platform, we can always port to the other one fairly easily. >> >> Drop us a line once you're ready for it to be reviewed. :) >> >> >> Took must more time than expected :( >> Post is ready in pitch state now. https://fedoramagazine.org/?p=13838 >> Let me know your review about it :) >> May be need more cleanup. >> >> Thanks, >> Pravin Satpute >> >> > Unless another editor tackles it before me, I'll make sure this one gets > brought up at our regular meeting time on Thursday. Thanks for working on > this, Pravin! :)
I had quick discussion with Paul on this. We need to think more on G11N article for FedoraMagazine. I will move this article to CommunityBlog soon. Thanks Justin :) - Pravin
-- Fedora Marketing mailing list [email protected] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[email protected]
