On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Samer Mansour <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I want to start up the discussion with the website work once again since > the logos are very similar and will be picked by next week. > > I have already documented different pages and sites we currently have > running. > > I think we should start mocking up templates, colors, lorem ipsum, colours, > the logo placement, footer, header, etc. We should stick to wireframing, do > not place a lot of work into details or copying content yet. jpeg or png > mock ups are fine. >
As you know, what we have on the website today, at least for the static content (non-wiki) sections is a mashup of HTML/MDTEXT with CSS and header/footer/nav provided by the CMS template. So the basic page looks something like this: http://www.openoffice.org/style-test.html My guess is we'll want to play with all three layers here, and do so in a way that does not interfere with the existing website. So we might want to ask Infra for a separate CMS target to play with, that can have its own templates, etc., We could, for example, have a /site-test in SVN that maps to an www-test.openoffice.org, or something like that. > We can start brain storming here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Website+Ideas > I gave some input on the larger topic here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Website+Strategic+Plan My main complaints were around visual consistency and the difficulty of maintaining native language websites. -Rob > Samer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
