On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Michael Hasselmann
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Do we want to go as far as to organize tracks? I don't think it fits the
> unconference theme. For topics, I will take a closer look at the
> schedules of QtCS 2011 and the two Qt Developer Days 2011. I'll probably
> start a wiki page somewhere so that we can add/remove topics.
>
There's already the proposal section on the main qtcs planning page
Quim started, but when you have a new page set for that let me know so
I can move those suggestions there. (Admittedly they're all mine ...;)

> Current plan is to have a table with topics, descriptions, relevant
> maintainers and perhaps allow others to +1 topics, so that we get an
> idea on what's hot. Such a table would act as a guide for interested
> contributors, and we might also want them to leave their name next to
> the topics they're interested in (=> could help with room management).

I'd like also to suggest we combine this with perhaps +1 on "want to
know more" session on a subject, such that new contributors could
support their interest with an intro to that library, code or activity
in the project they're interested in. Once we have this we can try and
allocate mentors to run this intro bits (for example, how to use
gerrit to do docs contribution , or how to use gerrit and the new Qt5
contribution model etc..)

Br,

-Sivan
_______________________________________________
Marketing mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing

Reply via email to