Let's not abuse cross-posting, please. On 04/27/2012 12:33 PM, ext Sivan Greenberg wrote: > Hi Tuuka, > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Turunen Tuukka > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think using the tracks is a good idea. Some 'keynotes' in the beginning >> for everyone, and after that the tracks. These help in finding the most >> interesting topics. >> > In favor of discussing this separately I started a new thread, to > remind- some my suggested tracks were: > + Qt Outreach (Docs, Marketing, Community, Commercial visibility) , > + Qt Core (-beta efforts, bug fixing sprint, feature finish, users > itches, new contributors etc.) > + Qt On (PI, android, iOS, etc.) > + Qt Extras (projects surrounding Qt that demand and contribute to its > development)
Before discussing tracks, can we decide which sessions we do want to have scheduled in advanced? We have - 3 plenary sessions for the beginning of every morning. - 2 plenary 'hack & tell' sessions to be confirmed. - Last session, probably a plenary closure. The rest of sessions will run in parallel. What topics do we want to schedule in advance at the main room, with video recording? My bet is that once we have pre-filled the schedule we won't need to go for tracks for the rest. Unconference process will take care of itself. -- Quim _______________________________________________ Marketing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
