The non-identical content is one of the problems I was mentioning. It will be exactly the same soon. http://qt-project.org has always just been feeding of planetqt.org. It will soon feed of http://planet.qt-project.org's<http://planet.qt-project.org's> RSS feed instead.
Daniel From: ext Volker Götz [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 25, 2012 6:11 PM To: Molkentin Daniel (Nokia-MP/Berlin) Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Marketing] I'd like to blog at the labs.qt. blog or the equivalent if exists in qt-project.org Hi, Am 25.06.2012 um 18:01 schrieb Daniel Molkentin: There is planet.qt-project.org<http://planet.qt-project.org/>, which planetqt.org<http://planetqt.org/> is going to redirect. Apart from a fresh look, the immediate benefit is that its sources are on codereview, so you can add your own blog if you get a reviewer to acknowledge the relevance of your blog to the Qt community. That's how the approver model magically works. Yay! planetqt.org<http://planetqt.org/> is about to be transferred to the foundation and will be redirecting to planet.qt-project.org<http://planet.qt-project.org/> once I ironed out some weird behavior exhibited by rawdog. The wording is a bit unfortunate as we have two plantes right now: http://planet.qt-project.org/ and the aggregation on the home page of DevNet at http://qt-project.org/ Both show different contents. We should either rename one of them or make them being fed from identical sources. Cheers Volker
_______________________________________________ Marketing mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
