On 29 Jun 2012, at 16:34, drew jensen wrote: > On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 16:23 +0100, Simon Phipps wrote: >> Thanks for this, Drew. >> >> On 29 Jun 2012, at 16:09, drew jensen wrote: >>> >>> 1) Given that LibreOffice IMO really needs to focus on brand building, >>> particularly in the MS Windows space I would first drop all the >>> platforms other then Windows. >> >> OSCON has a lot of Mac users, so if it's at all possible to shoehorn on the >> Mac DMG that would be good. > > Yeah - I thought about that - it would require bumping something else > out of the image, but that is OK with me. > >> >>> >>> 2) The current libreoffice-na disk includes additional OSS applications, >>> again I propose to drop everything not for Windows. >> >> What sort of thing are they? Even Windows add-ons probably aren't essential, >> and if it makes room for the Mac version all the better. > you can see the original set at > http://libreoffice-na.us/English-3.5-installs/extras.html > > I already ditched anything that was not the latest release for windows > from that list.
I'd ditch the lot, honestly. > > The larger prize, space wise, is in dictionaries and templates, I would > need to drop something from those to fit the MAC distribution files in I > think, even if I dumped all the extras. Which are you including? I think it's safe to just include US English, and possibly Spanish. >>> >>> What I would propose is to go ahead and update this cover and the disk >>> label to show that it was distributed at OSCON 2012. I snagged some >>> artwork for doing this, not sure what steps (or rather who to ask) for >>> permission to do so from a trademark perspective - I'm hoping maybe >>> Simon could weigh in on that - if it seems like a good thing to do, and >>> I really think it is, the I could work on the artwork today. >> >> Happy to help. Since we're representing TDF, I don't think there will be any >> trademark problems even if you use the marks with the TDF underline, but >> I'll wait for the gurus to chip in on that too. > > I meant if I include some OSCON marks, that is the trademark I'm > concerned with, not TDF. Given Jean and I are both attending multiple events (including CLS) I think it would be better not to mention OSCON specifically. S. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/us/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
