As a follow-up to my own email, I want to add this.
For project management, ProjectLibre seems like a great fit with
LibreOffice.

According to the founder's submission on Joinup:

> ProjectLibre is an open source alternative to Microsoft Project.  It is
> compatible with Project 2003, 2007 and 2010 files and runs on Linux, Mac or
> Wiindows.  ProjectLibre is perfect as a compliment to OpenOffice and
> LibreOffice. Microsoft Project is on 7% of all desktops so this is a
> significant addition to the open source ecosystem.

http://joinup.ec.europa.eu/software/projectlibre/description


Are there differences in the licences used by PL and LO, and if yes, what
are they?

Immanuel


On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Immanuel Giulea
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Well to be fair, I raised three points that seemed to me were the
> arguments of MS feature-wise.
>
> Other arguments are listed, and my suggestion was to create a new wiki
> page where we could compare (side-by-side) LO and MSO.
>
> Summary of arguments from MS against LO
>
> *Arguments about $$*
>
>    - Total costs: Business impact; like software issues, integration,
>    incompatibility, run-time errors, downtime, unreliable support and
>    security vulnerability.
>    - Total benefit: Such as reliable supports, updates, accessibility,
>    and security.
>    - Integration cost: The cost associated when you decide to use a
>    different software platform.
>    - Management: Can it be easily managed? Large companies tend to have
>    this issue because they don’t have a unified system.
>    - Deployment costs: Can it handle corporate size business
>    productivity? In addition to the compromise or extra benefits of
>    software alternatives.
>    - OpenOffice/LibreOffice does not provide the same depth of
>    functionality as Microsoft Office as a result do not meet the needs of some
>    end users. This will force your organization to manage multiple software
>    suites potentially increasing IT costs.
>
>
>    - When running a mixed software environment you are also running the
>    risk of interoperability issues which could further increase IT and
>    helpdesk costs, inhibit productivity, and generate end users frustration.
>    - Additional factors that could create higher costs include
>    integration with your existing systems and applications like ERP and
>    content management systems and software updates.
>    - *LibreOffice*/OpenOffice *does not allow for incremental software
>    updates. *Instead it requires a complete uninstall and reinstall every
>    time you need to update the software.
>
>
> *Arguments more about features*
>
>
>    - Office drives increasing business value through innovations that
>    span basic functionality, like copy and paste, to advanced features like
>    business intelligence.
>    - LibreOffice/OpenOffice does not deliver a complete productivity
>    suite. Critical components like email and calendaring are absent, not
>    to mention equivalent software to Publisher, OneNote, Business Contact
>    Manager and SharePoint Workspace.
>    - LibreOffice / OpenOffice also lack some commonly used components,
>    for instance; they do not ship with commonly used functionality like
>    user friendly ribbons, clipart, SmartArt or Pivot Charts.
>    - Organizations may have to fill these application gaps with product
>    extensions, additional software or customizations adding to cost and
>    complexity.
>
>
> *Arguments about collaboration*
>
>
>    - Collaboration technology should facilitate ease of sharing, and
>    trust in the fidelity of information shared. To facilitate collaboration,
>    Office 2010 has many new features including co-authoring, integration with
>    the Microsoft Unified Communications technologies in addition to the new
>    online companion applications, the Office Web Applications.
>    - People using OpenOffice/LibreOffice are limited to using
>    disparate email and document repositories to share and edit documents one
>    person at a time. To take advantage of advanced collaboration
>    technologies will require additional software and possibly more
>    customization. In addition to sharing documents, information
>    formatting integrity is critical.
>    - LibreOfice/OpenOffice can read and output many file types, however vital
>    information like formatting structures, calculations, layout, and macros
>    may not be preserved when sharing with non OpenOffice/LibreOffice
>    users.
>    - Whether you have a mixed group of users or plan to share documents
>    with people outside of your organization you may not be able to trust that
>    people receive the document with the intended content and formatting.
>
> *Security/Sensitive information*
>
>
>    - OpenOffice/LibreOffice are limited to only password protecting
>    files. Although password protected documents can be effective, they do
>    not ensure security and may cause additional complexity.
>    - Advantage and also weakness of OpenOffice/LibreOffice for being an
>    open source software means that many users have the ability to alter
>    the state of the software by integrating their own design, which could lead
>    to security vulnerability issue.
>    - Microsoft Office provides a robust set of features for securing
>    documents that reduces the risk and cumbersomeness of password only
>    protection.
>    - Information Rights Management (IRM) allows individuals and
>    administrators to specify permissions to documents, workbooks, and
>    presentations. This helps prevent sensitive information from being printed,
>    forwarded, or copied by unauthorized people. After permission for a file
>    has been restricted using IRM, the access and usage restrictions
>    are enforced no matter where the information is.
>
> *Arguments about "Cloud"*
>
>    - OpenOffice/LibreOffice does not provide any other deployment option
>    besides the desktop.
>    - Microsoft provides a seamless experience across the PC, phone,
>    and browser.
>
> *Future-looking arguments*
>
>    - OpenOffice/LibreOffice may be limited in providing the next
>    generation of productivity, cloud computing, lacking the ecosystem of
>    enabling server and consumer collaboration technologies likeSharePoint and 
> SkyDrive.
>    - Choosing Microsoft Office will help ensure that you can take
>    advantage of the next generation of productivity software.
>
>
>
> Is it possible to add this to a wiki or something please. We can work on
> it collaboratively :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Immanuel
>

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/us/marketing/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to