I don't fully understand several things about this topic, and so I'm cc'ing Allen Rice and Gail Lightfoot as they've expressed interest in it before, as well as M for his expertise on the subject of takeovers. 1) How does the certification/pledge requirement get enforced on elected central committee members? How does the state decide how many electable spots are available in each district? 2) What motive might one have for seeking election to a county central committee? It appears to be primarily a way to avoid paying dues. 3) The Bylaws talk about election to the "state central committee" via "Libertarian voters in a primary election pursuant to the relevant parts of the election code", but the election <http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=elec&group=07001-0800 0&file=7770-7783> code talks only about "county central committees". Why doesn't this mismatch mean simply that there is currently no extant referent for "the relevant parts of the election code"? 4) Do all of the Peace & Freedom election code provisions apply to us? Sections <http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=48655410977+12+0+0&WAI Saction=retrieve> 7800 and 7802 sound like a recipe for a takeover attempt:
7800. At the convention meeting of the state central committee, the state central committee shall consist initially of only those members of central committees elected at the most recent direct primary election. 7802. At its convention and subsequent meetings the state central committee, in its sole discretion, may appoint any additional members to the state central committee as it may desire. 5) Does our decision affect whether or not 7805 applies to the LPCA? I don't want it to apply. 7805. This committee may remove any elected or appointed member who, during the term of membership, affiliates with or registers as a member of another political party, publicly advocates that the voters should not vote for the nominee of the party for any office, publicly gives support to or avows a preference for a candidate of another party or candidate who is opposed to a candidate nominated by this party, or has violated the bylaws or constitution of the state central committee. I don't agree that the Bylaws mandate County Central Committee elections, even if the ambiguity in (3) above were resolved. Since the Bylaws reference the election code, and the election code says the elections are optional, then the Bylaws references to elected county central committee members could easily have been intended to cover the contingency of the elections having been held, rather than assuming that the elections must be held. I don't like the idea of the LPCA voluntarily choosing to further entangle our private associations with the state election code -- especially a code written for another party, and with such suspicious provisions. I didn't even mention these other provisions of the P&F election code that I found: 7803. The state central committee may require a balance of elected and appointed members so that 50 percent of the state central committee members from each county are women and 50 percent are men. 7851. A county central committee may require a balance of elected and appointed committee members to create a total membership division of 50 percent women and 50 percent men. There might be more garbage like this, as I haven't read the whole thing. I think we should distance ourselves from it as much as possible, rather than ask that it apply to us (or ask that it apply to us more thoroughly). Unless somebody can answer these questions, I plan to vote against allowing central committee elections.
