The LP Bylaws Committee proposed in October an anti-takeover provision
that says in part: "No person may serve as Chair or Vice-Chair who has
not served as a member of the National Committee prior to the last
general election for President." Yesterday LP presidential candidate
and frequent LP Chair candidate George Phillies claimed on LPradicals
thatWhat that sentence means is that only members of the current LNC
can _serve_ (that's not the same as "be elected" ) as the next National
Chair, and the current LNC (or perhaps its successor) are the only
people who can supply the National Chair through the year 2014. Ernie
Hancock, who is running for National Chair this time, appears to have
worked out a great advantage he has relative to past years: He will be
running against the incumbent. His disadvantage, if you note the tense
of "has served", is that if this Bylaw passes he will be unable to
serve as National Chair, even if he is elected.I don't see how Phillies
can read the rule that way, unless he's saying that every living
alumnus of the LNC who served before Nov 2004 is also currently an LNC
member -- which I find very hard to believe.Scott Lieberman points out
on the BylawsCom blog that it's somewhat vague whether "member"
includes alternates. I would guess not.The anti-takeover intent of the
rule is good, but I don't see the point of requiring LNC tenure farther
back than the previous term, and the qualifying positions might be
expanded to include, say, state chairs. The more interesting
anti-takeover proposal is the one to lengthen Judicial Committee terms
to 14 years and stagger them so the whole committee never turns over at
once. The core idea of avoiding complete turnover is a good one, but 14
years seems too long, and there should be some way for a super-majority
of NatCon delegates to prematurely terminate a JudCom member. Maybe the
margin of victory needed to defeat a JudCom incumbent could be
proportional to the time left in her term?

--
Posted By Brian Holtz to Libertarian Intelligence at 12/29/2007
08:59:00 AM

Reply via email to