Quoth Brian Holtz:

-----
What Brian Holtz quoted was the dictionary definition of 'censor'
-----

Everyone has bad habits. One of yours is quoting "a" dictionary
definition of something, then blithely pretending that what you just
quoted was "the" dictionary definition of that thing.

Sometimes what you leave out is at least as important as what you
include. For example, with respect to the word "censor," you leave out
the fact that from the very beginning, the word referred to
compulsory/coercive action by government (it was the title given to
two Roman officials who "supervised public morals"), and that it has
always meant that except in some rarefied areas of leftist and
conspiracy-theory dogma where it is asserted that a quasi-state
phenomenon of similar effect exists (i.e "the capitalists [or
Zionists, or alien collaborators] control the media"). If you're going
to assert such a dogma, I'd be interested in seeing the entire dogma,
not just one of its applications.

If you want to bandy dictionary definitions, WordNet's first
definition for the verb form of "censor" is "forbid the public
distribution of."

Under that definition, the moderators' activities at lpradicals don't
even come close to "censorship," since there exist at least thousands,
and probably hundreds of thousands, of other similar venues in which
any content one might want to post can be freely posted, including one
provided by the same group, and almost of all of which are more
"public" than lpradicals itself.

Your use of the word "censor" with reference to lpradicals isn't an
accurate descriptive usage. Rather, it's an attempt to slip an
association fallacy into your argument deck by illicitly broadening a
long-established definition. I note that Mr. Cohen has not thus far
chosen to post his piece at the lpradicals-discuss list, which is not
moderated. From that, I can reasonably deduce that his purpose is not
so much to have the piece read as to be able to falsely squawk (or
have you falsely squawk on his behalf) about non-existent "censorship."

Regards,
Tom Knapp

Reply via email to