Dan Sullivan wrote: DS) Why should any of us care about e-mails you send to Marc or Marc sends to you? (DS
Because Marc is a moderator on LPradicals, and he uses that power to criticize me there by name and then deny me the privilege of answering him there. So I answer him here. How was this not obvious from my posting? DS) If Marc doesn't want e-mails from you, don't send them. (DS If Marc doesn't want me to answer his public criticisms of me, he shouldn't issue them. DS) If you don't want e-mails from Marc, tell him privately not to send them. (DS I invite any criticism, from Marc or anybody else, that can improve (or, by failing, validate) my proposals for LP policy. DS) That does not mean we want to hear people's snits about things that don't concern us. (DS The "snit" here was Marc's, apparently over the unfortunate fact that the universe isn't arranged so that he can publicly criticize me by name and not ever hear back from me about it. DS) We certainly don't care about the nuts and bolts of how somone's e-mail leaves his computer. (DS If an LPradicals moderator tries to tell me (in front of a cc'd audience you don't know about but that includes people on this forum) that my responses to his public criticisms of me on LPradicals constitute some kind of force initiation (i.e. contract violation) by me, then I'm going to correct that criticism here as well. Every time. Brian Holtz http://LibertarianIntelligence.com <http://libertarianintelligence.com/> Signal Intelligence About The LP
