Kevin Bjornson wrote: KB) That a majority of likely delegates favor silence on schisms is a major breakthrough (KB
Unfortunately, due to the phrasing of the question, we don't actually know that. All we know is that with a forced choice between silence and "compromise language acknowledg[ing] there is more than one acceptable position", half chose silence. It could just be that those people reject the idea that there can ever be "more than one acceptable position". And it could just be that the other half of the respondents favor minor variants in our position over silence. Again, we just don't really learn anything useful from this question. KB) Brian realizes that absolute non-interventionism would be disastrous. Since he also believes that non-interventionism is a libertarian principle (KB That's not what I believe. The best way to state what I believe is to quote me. It's not like I don't write a lot, so it shouldn't be hard to quote me on whatever topic interests you. :-)
