Brian Miller wrote:

BM) why are Mr. Holtz, and apparently at least a few other Libertarians, in
so much denial about the fact that "states' rights" doctrine was created as
an underpinning to justify slavery?  (BM

Typical Miller mendacity.  I repeat:

BH) I don't dispute that the label "states' rights" has been seriously
tainted by the issue of slavery, but it would be simply addled to claim that
the concept of federalism and decentralism is inherently unlibertarian.  Do
you dare so claim, or not?  (Probability of Miller answering: ~3%)  (BH

Turns out my probability estimate erred on the high side.
 
Here's James Madison writing in Federalist 45 about states' rights, but
invoking classical Greece rather than America's slave states:

JM) We have seen, in all the examples of ancient and modern confederacies,
the strongest tendency continually betraying itself in the members, to
despoil the general government of its authorities, with a very ineffectual
capacity in the latter to defend itself against the encroachments. Although,
in most of these examples, the system has been so dissimilar from that under
consideration as greatly to weaken any inference concerning the latter from
the fate of the former, yet, as the States will retain, under the proposed
Constitution, a very extensive portion of active sovereignty, the inference
ought not to be wholly disregarded. In the Achaean league it is probable
that the federal head had a degree and species of power, which gave it a
considerable likeness to the government framed by the convention. The Lycian
Confederacy, as far as its principles and form are transmitted, must have
borne a still greater analogy to it. Yet history does not inform us that
either of them ever degenerated, or tended to degenerate, into one
consolidated government. (JM

Here's Jefferson and Madison writing the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions:

KVR) the several States composing the United States of America, are not
united on the principle of unlimited submission to their general government;
but that by compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the
United States and of amendments thereto, they constituted a general
government for special purposes, delegated to that government certain
definite powers, reserving each State to itself, the residuary mass of right
to their own self-government; and that whensoever the general government
assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no
force: That to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an
integral party, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party....each
party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of
the mode and measure of redress. (KVR

Was the topic slavery?  No, the topic was the Alien and Sedition Acts.
 
Miller of course dared not claim that the concept of federalism and
decentralism is inherently unlibertarian.  Now I dare him to claim that
Madison, Hamilton, and Jefferson thought that the best thing about the
concept of states' sovereignty was that it would help preserve the
institution of slavery.
 
So how about it, Miller?  What new kind of mendacity or prevarication will
you muster to evade these central points?  What new smear will you use to
indict fellow libertarians for the crime of not subsuming their political
advocacy to your own narrow and self-involved agenda?  Do you seriously
think a single person here can't see straight through your transparent
tactics?

BM) I'd have hoped that a left-Libertarian of Mr. Holtz's standing, in
particular, would have distanced himself from such Lew Rockwellian
sentiments by this late date (BM

More Miller mendacity, implying that I hadn't already condemned the bigotry
of the Paul/Rockwell/Rothbard newsletters the very day the TNR story came
out, and multiple times since:
 
2008-01-16 Reason Connects NewsletterGate
<http://libertarianintelligence.com/2008/01/reason-connects-newslettergate-d
ots.html> Dots 
2008-01-12 Libertarians
<http://libertarianintelligence.com/2008/01/libertarians-react-to-paul-newsl
etter.html> React To Paul Newsletter Scandal
2008-01-08 TNR
<http://libertarianintelligence.com/2008/01/tnr-unearths-more-racism-homopho
bia-in.html> Unearths More Racism, Homophobia in Ron Paul Newsletters

Reply via email to