Dear colleagues,

We would like to draw your attention to the following paper, recently published 
in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology:

Riesch, Rüdiger and Deecke, Volker B. 2011. Whistle communication in 
mammal-eating killer whales (Orcinus orca): further evidence for acoustic 
divergence between ecotypes. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65:1377–1387, 
doi:10.1007/s00265-011-1148-8

ABSTRACT
Public signaling plays an important role in territorial and sexual displays in 
animals; however, in certain situations, it is advantageous to keep signaling 
private to prevent eavesdropping by unintended receivers. In the northeastern 
Pacific, two populations of killer whales (Orcinus orca), fish-eating 
“resident” killer whales and mammal-eating “transient” killer whales, share the 
same habitat. Previous studies have shown that residents use whistles as 
private signals during close-range communication, where they probably serve to 
coordinate behavioral interactions. Here, we investigated the whistling 
behavior of mammal-eating killer whales, and, based on divergent social 
structures and social behaviors between residents and transients, we predicted 
to find differences in both whistle usage and whistle parameters. Our results 
show that, like resident killer whales, transients produce both variable and 
stereotyped whistles. However, clear differences in whistle parameters between 
ecotypes show that the whistle repertoire of mammal-eating killer whales is 
clearly distinct from and less complex than that of fish-eating killer whales. 
Furthermore, mammal-eating killer whales only produce whistles during “milling 
after kill” and “surface-active” behaviors, but are almost completely silent 
during all other activities. Nonetheless, whistles of transient killer whales 
may still serve a role similar to that of resident killer whales. Mammal-eating 
killer whales seem to be under strong selection to keep their communication 
private from potential prey (whose hearing ranges overlap with that of killer 
whales), and they appear to accomplish this mainly by restricting vocal 
activity rather than by changes in whistle parameters.

KEYWORDS: Acoustic crypsis, communication networks, eavesdropping, feeding 
ecology, predation, private signals, public signals, social networks

Please contact the first author Rüdiger Riesch 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> with any questions about this 
research.

Best regards

Volker
------------------------------------------------
Dr. Volker Deecke
Sea Mammal Research Unit
Scottish Oceans Institute
University of St. Andrews
St. Andrews, Fife, KY16 8LB
Scotland UK

Phone +44.1334.463459
Fax +44.1334.463443
------------------------------------------------
The University of St Andrews is a charity registered in Scotland: No SC013532

_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to