Hi all,
 
two new publications on Australian sea lions; one using animal-borne sensors to 
 map oceanographic conditions during a seasonal upwelling event and how these 
conditions impact on adult male foraging behaviour, the other at gross 
differences in trophic ecology of adult females between regions using stable 
isotopes.  Any questions, dont hesitate to ask.
 
Lowther AD, Harcourt RG, Page B, Goldsworthy SD (2013) Steady as He Goes: 
At-Sea Movement of Adult Male Australian Sea Lions in a Dynamic Marine 
Environment. PLoS ONE 8(9): e74348. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0074348
 
Abstract
 
The southern coastline of Australia forms part of the worlds' only northern 
boundary current system. The Bonney Upwelling occurs every austral summer along 
the south-eastern South Australian coastline, a region that hosts over 80% of 
the worlds population of an endangered endemic otariid, the Australian sea 
lion. We present the first data on the movement characteristics and foraging 
behaviour of adult male Australian sea lions across their South Australian 
range. Synthesizing telemetric, oceanographic and isotopic datasets collected 
from seven individuals enabled us to characterise individual foraging behaviour 
over an approximate two year time period. Data suggested seasonal variability 
in stable carbon and nitrogen isotopes that could not be otherwise explained by 
changes in animal movement patterns. Similarly, animals did not change their 
foraging patterns despite fine-scale spatial and temporal variability of the 
upwelling event. Individual males tended to return to the same colony at which 
they were tagged and utilized the same at-sea regions for foraging irrespective 
of oceanographic conditions or time of year. Our study contrasts current 
general assumptions that male otariid life history strategies should result in 
greater dispersal, with adult male Australian sea lions displaying central 
place foraging behaviour similar to males of other otariid species in the 
region.
 
 
A. D. Lowther , R. G. Harcourt and S. D. Goldsworthy.  Regional variation in 
trophic ecology of adult female Australian sea lions inferred from stable 
isotopes in whiskers.  Wildlife Research 40(4), 303-311  
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/WR12181
 
Abstract
Context: The primary selective forces responsible for shaping life-history 
traits come from the physical and biological environment in which a species 
resides. Consequently, the limits of a species range may provide a useful 
measure of adaptive potential to environmental change. The proximity of 
foraging grounds to terrestrial nursing habitat constrains central-place 
foragers such as otariid seals in selecting breeding locations. The Australian 
sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) is an endangered otariid endemic to Australia, 
whose northern-range extent occurs at a temperate–tropical transition zone on 
the western coast of Western Australia (WA).

Aims: Currently, there is a complete absence of data on the foraging ecology of 
Australian sea lions in WA. We sought to address this critical knowledge gap 
and provide data on the foraging ecology of adult female Australian sea lions 
at three isolated breeding colonies in western WA.

Methods: We used stable-isotope ratios of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) in 
the whiskers of pups as proxies to characterise feeding behaviour of 10–28% of 
all adult female Australian sea lions at each colony. We then compared these 
geographic data to (1) conspecifics at similar latitude in South Australia (SA) 
and (2) isotopic data collated from other studies on seabirds that inhabit the 
region, to place foraging behaviour of adult female Australian sea lions into 
context.

Key results: At the southernmost colonies in WA, individual animals were 
members of one of two distinct isotopic clusters that could be described by 
differences in δ15N and δ13C values. Individuals at the northernmost colony 
displayed δ15N values similar to those of seabirds in the same region. Across 
the study, isotope ratios of adult female Australian sea lions in western WA 
were between 3‰ and 5‰ lower than those observed at a colony at similar 
latitude in SA.

Conclusions: Gross differences in the physical oceanography between WA and SA 
may in part explain the differences in isotope ratios of individuals between 
the regions, with lower δ15N and δ13C values in WA probably reflecting the 
relatively depauperate conditions of the Leeuwin Current.

Implications: Potential regional differences in trophic structure should be 
considered when developing appropriate management plans for Australian sea 
lions and regional variation in the diet of Australian sea lion warrants 
further investigation.

 
 
Andy Lowther
 
Postdoctoral Research Fellow - Biodiversity Section
Norwegian Polar Institute
 
tel: +47 77 75 05 44
e: [email protected]
 
_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to