We would like to draw to the attention of the MARMAM community the recent 
publication of the following papers:

Dunlop, R. A., Noad, M. J., McCauley, R., Kniest, E., Paton, D., Slade, R. & 
Cato, D.H. 2016. Response of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) to 
ramp-up of a small experimental air gun array. Marine Pollution Bulletin 
103(1-2):72-83.

'Ramp-up', or 'soft start', is a mitigation measure used in seismic surveys and 
involves increasing the radiated sound level over 20-40 min. This study 
compared the behavioural response in migrating humpback whales to the first 
stages of ramp-up with the response to a 'constant' source, 'controls' (in 
which the array was towed but not operated) with groups in the absence of the 
source vessel used as the 'baseline'. Although the behavioural response, in 
most groups, resulted in an increase in distance from the source (potential 
avoidance), there was no evidence that either 'ramp-up' or the constant source 
at a higher level was superior for triggering whales to move away from the 
source vessel. 'Control' groups also responded suggesting the presence of the 
source vessel had some effect. However, the majority of groups appeared to 
avoid the source vessel at distances greater than the radius of most mitigation 
zones.

                PDF available at http://authors.elsevier.com/a/1SaCw,ashegqZ 
until 10 April.

Dunlop, R.A., Noad, M.J., McCauley, R.D., Kniest, E., Paton, D. & Cato, D.H. 
2015. The behavioural response of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) to a 
20 cubic inch air gun. Aquatic Mammals 41(4):412-433.


Seismic surveys are widely used for exploration for oil and gas deposits below 
the sea floor. Despite concern they may have an impact on whale behaviour, our 
knowledge of marine mammal responses is limited. In the first of a series of 
experiments (the last one involving a full seismic array), this study tested 
the response of migrating humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) groups to a 
20 cubic inch air gun. Experiments were carried out during the southward 
migration of humpback whales along the east coast of Australia. Groups of 
whales were focally followed from land stations and/or small boats with 
observations before, during, and after exposure to a vessel towing the air gun. 
The source vessel moved either eastwards across the migratory flow or 
northwards into the migratory flow. In total, there were 18 control trials 
(where the source vessel ran the compressor and towed the air gun without it 
firing; n = 35 groups) and 16 active trials (where the air gun was firing every 
11 s; n = 32 whale groups). The air gun source level was 199 dB re 1 μPa2.s 
(Sound Exposure Level [SEL]) at 1 m, and SELs received by the whales varied 
from 105 to 156 dB re 1 μPa2.s (modal value 128 dB re μPa2.s) for SELs at least 
10 dB above the background noise (measured as dB re 1 μPa). Other baseline 
groups were focal followed when there was no source vessel in the area (n = 
25). Results suggested that humpback whale groups responded by decreasing both 
dive time and speed of southwards movement though the response magnitude was 
not found to be related to the proximity of the source vessel, the received 
level of the air gun, the tow path direction, or the exposure time within the 
during phase. There was no evidence of orientation of the groups towards, or 
away from, the source vessel in the during phase. Interestingly, this 
behavioural response was found in the control trials as well as the active 
trials suggesting a response to the source vessel.

                PDF available through Aquatic Mammals or by contacting the 
authors.

These are the first two major papers of the BRAHSS project, looking at 
behavioural effects of seismic air guns on migrating humpback whales. This has 
been a very large study, initiated in 2010. BRAHSS is being funded by the Joint 
Industry Programme on E&P Sound and Marine Life (JIP) and the US Bureau of 
Ocean Energy Management (BOEM).  The JIP partner companies include BG group, 
BHP Billiton, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Eni, ExxonMobil, IAGC, Santos, Statoil 
and Woodside with some additional funding from Origin Energy, Beach Energy and 
AWE, coordinated by the International Association of Oil and Gas Producers.

Rebecca Dunlop [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Mike Noad [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Doug Cato [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>



_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to