Dear colleagues,

we just published a comprehensive review in the journal Zoology, titled *'Whale
and dolphin responses to dead conspecifics'*.

A preview of the manuscript (uncorrected proof) is available at the link
below:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2018.05.003

Please contact the first author ([email protected]) if you wish to
receive a paginated pdf file.

Sincerely,

Giovanni Bearzi, Dan Kerem, Nathan B. Furey, Robert L. Pitman, Luke Rendell
and Randall R. Reeves


*Highlights*
• Effort-weighted study of 'postmortem attentive behaviour' (PAB) in
cetaceans.
• Dolphins (Delphinidae) accounted for 92.3% of 78 PAB records, baleen
whales 1.3%.
• Encephalisation was an important predictor of PAB across taxa.
• Female PAB towards dead calves (75%) may have been rescue attempts or
grieving.
• Male PAB was rare and possibly not caregiving.

*Abstract*
The scientific study of death across animal taxa—comparative
thanatology—investigates how animals respond behaviourally, physiologically
and psychologically to dead conspecifics, and the processes behind such
responses. Several species of cetaceans have been long known to care for,
attend to, be aroused by, or show interest in dead or dying individuals. We
investigated patterns and variation in cetacean responses to dead
conspecifics across cetacean taxa based on a comprehensive literature
review. We analysed 78 records reported between 1970 and 2016, involving 20
of the 88 extant cetacean species. We adopted a weighted comparative
approach to take observation effort into account and found that odontocetes
(toothed cetaceans) were much more likely than mysticetes (baleen whales)
to attend to dead conspecifics. Dolphins (Delphinidae) had the greatest
occurrence of attentive behaviour (92.3% of all records), with a weighed
attendance index 18 times greater than the average of all other cetacean
families. Two dolphin genera, *Sousa* and *Tursiops*, constituted 55.1% of
all cetacean records (*N* = 43) and showed the highest incidence of
attentive behaviour. Results of analyses intended to investigate the
reasons behind these differences suggested that encephalisation may be an
important predictor, consistent with the "social brain" hypothesis. Among
attending individuals or groups of known sex (*N* = 28), the majority
(75.0%) were adult females with dead calves or juveniles (possibly their
own offspring, with exceptions), consistent with the strong mother-calf
bond, or, in a few cases, with the bond between mothers and other females
in the group. The remaining records (25.0%) involved males either showing
sexual interest in a dead adult or subadult, or carrying a dead calf in the
presence of females. Because an inanimate individual is potentially
rescuable, responses to dead conspecifics—especially by females—can be
explained at least in part by attempts to revive and protect, having a
clear adaptive value. In some cases such responses are followed by
apparently maladaptive behaviour such as the long-term carrying of, or
standing by, a decomposed carcass, similar to observations of certain
terrestrial mammals. Among the possible explanations for the observed
cetacean behavioural responses to dead conspecifics are strong attachment
resulting in a difficulty of "letting go"—possibly related to grieving—or
perhaps individuals failing to recognise or accept that an offspring or
companion has died. Our current understanding is challenged by small sample
size, incomplete descriptions, and lack of information on the physiology
and neural processes underpinning the observed behaviour. We provide
research recommendations that would improve such understanding.


- - - - - - -
Giovanni Bearzi
President, Dolphin Biology and Conservation
<http://www.dolphinbiology.org/>
_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to