Dear MARMAM,

On behalf of my co-authors, I am pleased to announce our new paper 
investigating the controversial field metabolic rate of harbour porpoises using 
a combination of captive and wild data:

Rojano-Doñate, L., McDonald, B. I., Wisniewska, D. M., Johnson, M., Teilmann, 
J., Wahlberg, M., Højer-Kristensen, J. and Madsen, P. T. (2018). High field 
metabolic rates of wild harbour porpoises. Journal of Experimental Biology. 
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.185827

Abstract: Reliable estimates of field metabolic rates (FMRs) in wild animals 
are essential for quantifying their ecological roles, as well as for evaluating 
fitness consequences of anthropogenic disturbances. Yet, standard methods for 
measuring FMR are difficult to use on free ranging cetaceans whose FMR may 
deviate substantially from scaling predictions using terrestrial mammals. 
Harbour porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) are among the smallest marine mammals, 
and yet they live in cold, high-latitude waters where their high surface-to 
volume ratio suggests high FMRs to stay warm. However, published FMR estimates 
of harbour porpoises are contradictory, with some studies claiming high FMRs 
and others concluding that the energetic requirements of porpoises resemble 
those of similar-sized terrestrial mammals. Here, we address this controversy 
using data from a combination of captive and wild porpoises to estimate the FMR 
of wild porpoises. We show that FMRs of harbour porpoises are up to two times 
greater than for similar-sized terrestrial mammals, supporting the hypothesis 
that small, carnivorous marine mammals in cold water have elevated FMRs. 
Despite the potential cost of thermoregulation in colder water, harbour 
porpoise FMRs are stable over seasonally changing water temperatures. Varying 
heat loss seems to be managed via cyclical fluctuations in energy intake, which 
serve to build up a blubber layer that largely offsets the extra costs of 
thermoregulation during winter. Such high FMRs are consistent with the recently 
reported high feeding rates of wild porpoises and highlight concerns about the 
potential impact of human activities on individual fitness and population 
dynamics.

The paper is available via the following link: 
http://jeb.biologists.org/content/221/23/jeb185827?ijkey=a81c32632395fc8e76a72365ee06eb3d9d708882&keytype2=tf_ipsecsha

Please email me on 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> for a pdf 
copy.

Best regards,
Laia Rojano-Doñate

--------------------------------------------
Laia Rojano-Doñate
PhD Fellow
Zoophysiology - Department of Bioscience
Aarhus University

C.F. Møllers Allé 3, Building 1130
8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
tlf: +45 8715 4318
www.marinebioacoustics.com<http://www.marinebioacoustics.com>

_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to