Dear colleagues,

We are pleased to share our recent publication on assessing listening space 
reductions of marine mammals in relation to seasonal noise levels of two 
different tidal turbines installed in a dynamic tidal channel:

Pine MK, Schmitt P, Culloch RM, Lieber L, Kregting LT (2019) Providing 
ecological context to anthropogenic subsea noise: Assessing listening space 
reductions of marine mammals from tidal energy devices. Renewable and 
Sustainable Energy Reviews, 103, 49-57
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.024

Abstract
The deployment of tidal energy arrays is gaining momentum to provide marine 
renewable energy (MRE) to the global market. However, there are concerns over 
the potential impacts underwater noise emissions from operational devices may 
have on marine fauna. Auditory masking (the interference of important 
biological signals by anthropogenic noise) is a highly pervasive impact to 
marine fauna. We used a relatively new approach to evaluate the effects of 
noise from operational tidal energy devices on the listening space of marine 
mammals. Here, listening space reductions (LSR) for harbour porpoises (Phocoena 
phocoena) and harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) were assessed in winter and summer 
for two tidal energy devices of different designs. Results demonstrated that 
LSR was influenced by type of turbine, species, and season. For instance, LSRs 
for harbour seals were in excess of 80% within 60 m, whilst for harbour 
porpoises they were in excess of 55% within 10 m of the devices. For both 
species, LSRs were highest during winter, characterised by low ambient noise 
conditions. These findings highlight the importance of assessing masking over 
seasons, as masking effects are highly influenced by ambient noise conditions. 
Understanding the natural variation within seasons is also particularly 
relevant for tidal turbine noise assessments as devices are typically situated 
in highly dynamic environments. Since masking effects occur at the lower level 
of behavioural impacts in marine mammals, assessing the spatial extent of 
masking as part of environmental impact assessments is recommended. The 
listening space formula, which is largely based on measurable environmental 
factors (device and ambient noise), is transferable to any MRE device, or 
arrays, for any species (for which an audiogram can be assumed) and therefore 
provides an effective method to better inform MRE pre- and post-consenting 
processes.

https://authors.elsevier.com/c/1YIKJ4s9HvtxrUhttps://authors.elsevier.com/c/1YIKJ4s9HvtxrU

Follow the link above for free/open access until February 15th 2019.
Alternatively, you can request the full article via ResearchGate.

Best,
Lilian

Dr Lilian Lieber
Research Fellow
School of Natural and Built Environment
Queen's University Marine Laboratory Portaferry
12-13 The Strand, Portaferry
BT22 1PF Northern Ireland

Webpages: Research 
Gate<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lilian_Lieber/contributions>, Google 
Scholar  <https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=4IQLKaQAAAAJ&hl=en>
Mobile: +44 (0)7837425855

_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to