Dear MARMAM Community,

My co-authors and I are pleased to announce our recent open-access publication 
comparing cardiac electrical activity in marine and terrestrial mammals.

Storlund, R. L., Rosen, D. A. S., and Trites, A. W. (2021). 
Electrocardiographic scaling reveals differences in electrocardiogram interval 
durations between marine and terrestrial mammals. Front. Physiol. 12:690029. 
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.690029

Access the full article here: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.690029

Abstract:

Although the ability of marine mammals to lower heart rates for extended 
periods when diving is well documented, it is unclear whether marine mammals 
have electrophysiological adaptations that extend beyond overall bradycardia. 
We analyzed electrocardiographic data from 50 species of terrestrial mammals 
and 19 species of marine mammals to determine whether the electrical activity 
of the heart differs between these two groups of mammals. We also tested 
whether physiological state (i.e., anesthetized or conscious) affects 
electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. Analyses of ECG waveform morphology (heart 
rate, P-wave duration, and PQ, PR, QRS, and QT intervals) revealed allometric 
relationships between body mass and all ECG intervals (as well as heart rate) 
for both groups of mammals and specific differences in ECG parameters between 
marine mammals and their terrestrial counterparts. Model outputs indicated that 
marine mammals had 19% longer P-waves, 24% longer QRS intervals, and 21% 
shorter QT intervals. In other words, marine mammals had slower atrial and 
ventricular depolarization, and faster ventricular repolarization than 
terrestrial mammals. Heart rates and PR intervals were not significantly 
different between marine and terrestrial mammals, and physiological state did 
not significantly affect any ECG parameter. On average, ECG interval durations 
of marine and terrestrial mammals scaled with body mass to the power of 0.21 
(range: 0.19–0.23) rather than the expected 0.25—while heart rate scaled with 
body mass to the power of –0.22 and was greater than the widely accepted –0.25 
derived from fractal geometry. Our findings show clear differences between the 
hearts of terrestrial and marine mammals in terms of cardiac timing that extend 
beyond diving bradycardia. They also highlight the importance of considering 
special adaptations (such as breath-hold diving) when analyzing allometric 
relationships.

Please get in touch if you have any questions.

All the best,
Rhea
—
Rhea Storlund MSc (she/her)
PhD Candidate (Zoology)
Marine Mammal Research Unit
The University of British Columbia

Twitter: @RheaStorlund
Email: r.storlund[at]oceans.ubc.ca<http://oceans.ubc.ca>

_______________________________________________
MARMAM mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uvic.ca/mailman/listinfo/marmam

Reply via email to